Supplementary Files
Keywords
Well
Pressure
Temperature
Condensate-Banking
Skin
How to Cite
Abstract
Gas-condensate reservoirs represent a large part of the gas reserves in the world containing large amounts of hydrocarbons, but due to thermodynamic aspects and dynamic behaviour of fluids in these reservoirs, the production of resources presupposes a very complex activity that requires a broad understanding and mastery of various recovery mechanisms and reservoir engineering practices. In these reservoirs, when the pressure drops below the dew point pressure due to the production of its fluids, some liquid components emerge from the gas in the reservoir in condensate form and which over time accumulate in the vicinity of the well making the production activity very challenging for engineers. This accumulation of saturation of condensate decreases the relative permeability of the gas and intensifies in the vicinity from the well causing a block to the gas flow to the surface. Given the importance and the impact of this phenomenon on the productive capacity of the reservoir, becomes It is imperative to predict its occurrence in order to provide the control mechanisms and / or mitigation. This research is dedicated to studying transient pressure techniques as a way of identifying the condensate-banking phenomenon. To perform the experiments of this study it was necessary to use two types of software. The first software was the reservoir simulation, Eclipse, in the compositional model (E300), where reservoir and well tests were carried out. Then, the pressure transient test software, KAPPA-Saphir. With this study, it was possible to prove that by doing an analysis from the derivative curves of pressure the moment and circumstances in which Condensate-Banking occurs can be predict.
References
Ali, F. (2014). Importance of water Influx and waterflooding in Gas condensate reservoir. Obtido em 5 de Abril de 2018
Amani, M., & Nguyen, N. (May de 2015). An Overview of Methods to Mitigate Condensate Banking in Retrograde Gas Reservoirs. CSCanada, 9, 1. Obtido em Mar de 2018, de httpciteseerx.ist.psu.eduviewdocdownloaddoi=10.1.1.852.5604&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Bang, V. (2007). Development of a Successful Chemical Treatment for Gas Wells with Condensate or Water Blocking Damage. Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas, Texas.
Belinha, A. (2016). DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS CONDENSATE RESERVOIR: CASE STUDY OF THE NIGER DELTA.
Echenique, E. A. (2016). Gas Condensate Banking – Application of Pressure Transient Analysis to Determine Production Impairment and Compositional Effects. OMV.
Fan, L., Harris, B. W., Jamaluddin, A., Kamath, J., Mott, R., Poppe, G. A., . . . Witson, C. H. (2005/2006). Understanding Gas-Condensate Reservoirs.
Houzé, O., Viturat, D., & Fjaere, O. S. (2008-2018). Dynamic Data Analysis - Pressure Transiente Analysis, Rate Transiente Analysis, Formation Testing, Prodution logging and the use of Perfomanent Dawnhole Gauges. KAPPA.
Kgogo, T. (2011). WELL TEST ANALYSIS OF LOW PERMEABILITY MEDIUM-RICH TO RICH GAS CONDENSATE HOMOGENEOUS AND LAYERED RESERVOIRS. London: Imperial College - Centre for Petroleum Studies.
Lal, R. (2003). WELL TESTING IN GAS-CONDENSATE RESERVOIRS. STANFORD: PETROLEUM ENGINEERING OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY. Obtido em 5 de Abril de 2018
Lee, J., & Wattenbarger, R. (1996). Gas Reservoir Engineering (Vol. 5). Texas: Society of Petrolium Engineers - SPE.
Lloyd, P. (September de 2011). Productivity of Gas Condensate Fields Below The Dew Point: A North Sea Case Study. Department of Earth Science and Engineering Centre for Petroleum Studies.
Miller, N. (2009). INCREASING WELL PRODUCTIVITY IN GAS CONDENSATE WELLS IN QATAR’S NORTH FIELD. Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University, Texas.
Mohammed Sayed; Ghaithan Al-Muntasheri. (2016). Mitigation of the Effects of Condensate Banking: A Critical Review. (SPE, Ed.) (Petroleum Engineers), 1. Obtido em Mar de 2018, de https://pt.scribd.com/document/297265933/Mititigation-of-the-Effect-of-Condensate-Banking-A-Critical-Review
Mott, R., Cable, A., & Spearing, M. (October de 1999). A New Method of Measuring Relative Permeabilities for Calculating Gas-Condensate Well Deliverability. SPE.
Nagarajan, N., Honarpour, M., & Sampath, K. (s.d.). COMPARISON OF GAS-CONDENSATE RELATIVE PERMEABILITY USING LIVE FLUID vs. MODEL FLUIDS.
Rahimzadeh, A., Bazargan, M., Darvishi, R., & Mohammadi, A. H. (24 de May de 2016). Condensate blockage study in gas condensate reservoir. (Elsevier, Ed.)
Safari-Beidokhtil, M., & Hashemi, A. (November de 2015). Condensate blockage effects in well test analysis of dual porosity/dual-permeability, naturally fractured gas condensate reservoirs: a simulation approach. Cross Mark.
Shi, C. (2005). FLOW BEHAVOIR OF GAS - CONDENSATE WELLS. THE DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
Singh, K., & Whitson, C. (November de 2008). Gas Condensate Pseudopressure in Layered Reservoirs. SPE.
SPE. (2007). Identifying Condensate Banking With Multiphase Flowmeters—A Case Study. Reservoir Caracterization & Simulation Conference. SPE.
Ursin, J. R. (2016). GAS-CONDENSATE BANKING AND WELL DELIVERABILITY. A COMPARATIVE STUDY USING ANALYTICAL - AND NUMERICAL MODELS (Vol. 33). University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway. Obtido em Mar de 2018, de http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/drill.2016.33.2.259
Whitson, C. (1999). Gas Condensate Relative Permeability for Well Calculations. SPE.
Zhang, H., & Wheaton, R. (7–10 de November de 2000). Condensate Banking Dynamics in Gas Condensate Fields: Changes in Produced Condensate to Gas Ratios. SPE(Petroleum Engineers), 1. Obtido em Mar de 2018